Fons Luminis, an annual peer-reviewed journal of the Centre for Medieval Studies in the University of Toronto, is seeking submissions from current graduate students. Articles should be at least 4,000 words; we particularly encourage submissions with a strong interdisciplinary emphasis.
Fons Luminis is also still accepting submissions focusing on the special theme of its forthcoming issue—“Reassessing the New Historicism”—particularly those examining topics drawn from the late Middle Ages, New Historicism being mainly employed in the literary and historiographical analysis of late medieval and early modern texts. Submissions discussing and/or employing any other methodologies in literary criticism and historiography are welcome as well.
In lieu of book reviews, Fons Luminis now publishes longer review articles, which situate a recent and/or seminal book in the context of relevant scholarship. Submissions in this category should be at least 1,500 words.
Deadline for submissions: 10 February 2011. Submissions or enquiries may be sent electronically to email@example.com. Electronic submissions are preferred.
“The new historicism erodes the firm ground of both criticism and literature. It tends to ask questions about its own methodological assumptions and those of others.” –Stephen Greenblatt
Certain features of the New Historicist school—particularly its awareness of the historical contexts of both authorship and readership—have become commonplace in modern scholarship. Other aspects of the New Historicist approach are more problematic, particularly within the field of Medieval Studies. For this issue of Fons Luminis, we would like to solicit short articles (approximately 4000 words) from graduate students on the general topic of New Historicism. Does Greenblatt’s seminal work, Renaissance Self-Fashioning, speak compellingly to pre-Renaissance scholarship? Is the methodology still relevant to current research, or is its theory already a little dated? Is New Historicism merely a pet theory of North American academia? What about the British analogue, cultural materialism, and/or the French analogue in the works of Michel Foucault? Are these still helpful to us? What is the relationship between New Historicism and the more recent New Formalism? How can New Historicism, primarily a literary movement, be of use to historians and historiographers? Articles addressing any such questions, and/or employing New Historicist principles or methodology, are welcome.
Fons Luminis has adopted a new format, soliciting articles exclusively from graduate students, while still including a keynote essay from an established scholar, as well as review articles of seminal and recent books relevant to the theme. Our articles are peer-reviewed first by our graduate staff and then by professorial reviewers. The new shorter article format, allowing for more submissions, facilitates discussion and provides a place for graduate students to expound upon their own ideas and respond to those of other young scholars.
Submissions or enquiries may be sent electronically to firstname.lastname@example.org. Submissions for this issue should be received by 15 July 2010.
Why Fons Luminis? The Editors
Étienne Gilson: Art, Literature, and Philosophy Brian Stock
Between Death and Survival: Norfolk Cattle, c. 1280–1370 Philip Slavin
The Sources of the Earliest Latin Descriptions of Canada and First Nations by the Jesuits Haijo Jan Westra and Milo Nikolic, with Alison Mercer
Time and Understanding in Inferno X: Augustine’s Distentio Animi Jenna Sunkenberg